You’re right. This kind of recognition looks more like managing what remains of colonialism rather than ending it. When the main condition is ‘Israel’s security’ instead of Palestinians’ real rights including the right of return and the right to defend themselves, what gets created is an empty state. It means independence on paper, but the continuation of the same reality of occupation and discrimination.
Recognizing Palestine with conditions like disarmament and guarantees for Israel's security is neither freedom nor justice; it is merely a shameful political show by
Western countries that tramples on the rights of Palestinians.
I keep praying for real freedom.
You’re right. This kind of recognition looks more like managing what remains of colonialism rather than ending it. When the main condition is ‘Israel’s security’ instead of Palestinians’ real rights including the right of return and the right to defend themselves, what gets created is an empty state. It means independence on paper, but the continuation of the same reality of occupation and discrimination.
Recognizing Palestine with conditions like disarmament and guarantees for Israel's security is neither freedom nor justice; it is merely a shameful political show by
Western countries that tramples on the rights of Palestinians.
So is it counted as a way to the peace? Or it’s a coin of two sides?